Hero image for "Hegseth at White Sands Is the Signal Directed Energy Has Been Waiting For"

Hegseth at White Sands Is the Signal Directed Energy Has Been Waiting For


Defense secretaries don't drive out to New Mexico to watch weapons demos unless someone wants a photograph that means something. When Pete Hegseth and Pentagon CTO Emil Michael showed up at White Sands Missile Range on Tuesday to watch laser and microwave weapons fire live, it was — according to Laser Wars, which broke the story — the first time a sitting U.S. defense secretary had personally observed a directed-energy weapon firing. That's a deliberate signal, not a field trip.

The technology on display included the Army Multi-Purpose High Energy Laser, built on AeroVironment's LOCUST platform, which separately downed multiple drones from the deck of the USS George H.W. Bush during October trials. The capability is real. What's been missing is institutional commitment at the top — the kind that unlocks procurement budgets and clears bureaucratic friction.

That commitment is now arriving with money attached. The Trump administration's FY2027 budget blueprint put more than $2 billion toward directed-energy R&D. An AeroVironment vice president described the combination of funding and technology maturation as a "perfect storm" for broader deployment. Heavy-duty 300- and 600-kilowatt lasers are already penciled into the Trump-class battleship program.

I wrote about directed energy's demand signal problem back in May — the technology kept proving itself in tests while the Pentagon's procurement machinery stayed noncommittal. What's changed is the optics of leadership. When the secretary of defense personally witnesses a live firing, program managers across the services notice. Budgets follow attention.

The near-term question for investors and primes: which companies are positioned to scale from demonstration hardware to fielded systems before the FY27 budget cycle locks in its winners. AeroVironment has a named platform and a carrier-deck proof point. That's a different conversation than "promising lab results."